Public summary

Automated Plough Control as a step towards autonomous ploughing

Vantage Agrometius

Less steering, more focus on ploughing

When ploughing becomes more automated, you want to know what happens to the guidance line, working width and ploughing result. Wageningen Research tested the GeoPlough ISO plough control system developed by Vantage Agrometius during regular ploughing work. Automatic straight-line driving worked stably and accurately in this practical test. Adjusting the working width still needed further development. This test contributes to the further development of automated solutions for open-field farming within Handsfree Agrifood. 

Innovation package, use case and test type

    Status completed

    Technical functionality

    TF-1

    Broad knowledge question

    Automatic straight-line driving requires less attention from the operator

    Ploughing is not only about following a straight line. This practical test looked at the operation and user experience of automatic plough control. With automatic straight-line driving, the driver needs to pay less attention to the guidance line. This reduces the need for manual steering corrections and lowers the operator's mental workload. 

    Approach

    It's not just about driving straight, but also making accurate corrections

    The GeoPlough ISO plough control system was tested during regular ploughing work. The test looked at different automatic functions and at how the system responded to changes during ploughing. Ease of use, reliability and the support experienced by the driver were also included. In that work, what matters is not only whether the line stays straight, but also what a correction does to the ploughing result. 

    Goal

    Straight-line driving performs well, working width control needs improvement

    The objective was to determine which ploughing functions can already be carried out automatically and reliably, and which functions still need further development. Automatic straight-line driving requires less attention from the operator. When adjusting the working width, the operator still needs to monitor the ploughing result closely. 

    Results and reflection

    Automatic straight-line driving works well, working width control needs further development

    The outcomes show where automatic plough control already supported the driver in this practical test and where further development is still The test shows which functions already provide reliable support for the operator and which still need improvement. 

    Successes 

    • Automatic straight-line driving worked stably and accurately. 

    • Users experienced this as clear support during ploughing. 

    • The driver had to pay less attention to following the guidance line. As a result, the mental strain during ploughing decreased. 

     

    Learning points 

    • Automatic adjustment of the working width proved less robust. 

    • Abrupt corrections can lead to a less even ploughing result. 

    • Further development and testing under different conditions are needed to assess these functions more clearly. 

    Leading partners involved